Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instant Virus Killer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instant Virus Killer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issues: not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia per (WP:N) BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 15:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non notable software. --Monterey Bay (talk) 02:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per multiple reliable sources provided. Remember, Notability is established by multiple, reliable, third-party references (they're just placed in the external links section instead of inline like they should be). - Burpelson AFB ✈ 13:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fluff interviews and routine announcements don't count as coverage. Nor would you expect coverage for a product with (as one source says) 100 users (that's one HUNDRED). EEng (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.